<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Purpose of the 2nd Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freedomfactory.skyrocket.me/purpose-of-the-2nd-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freedomfactory.skyrocket.me/purpose-of-the-2nd-amendment/</link>
	<description>Freedom Blog, Liberty Blog, Blogging About Freedom, Capitalism, Free Markets, Free Society, Political Freedom, Economic Freedom, Personal Finance, Financial Freedom, Austrian Economics, Libertarian Politics, Consevative Politics, End The Fed, Fighting Socialism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 23:03:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://skyrocket.me/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://freedomfactory.skyrocket.me/purpose-of-the-2nd-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-2243</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomfactory.skyrocket.me/?p=1630#comment-2243</guid>
		<description>The Second Amendment is simple to understand for those willing to accept what the Forefathers meant. Reviewing Historic statements by the Forefathers clarify&#039;s their intentions. When questioned about the statement &quot;Who are the Militia&quot; Jeffersons answer was &quot;The People&quot;. Clouding of the meaning of the 2nd is caused by the agendas of groups like the Brady Bunch and their mis-information targeted at mis-informed people. One must remember that without &quot;Guns and Men who knew how to use them--we would be living under The Rising Sun, or saluting a swaztica&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Second Amendment is simple to understand for those willing to accept what the Forefathers meant. Reviewing Historic statements by the Forefathers clarify&#8217;s their intentions. When questioned about the statement &#8220;Who are the Militia&#8221; Jeffersons answer was &#8220;The People&#8221;. Clouding of the meaning of the 2nd is caused by the agendas of groups like the Brady Bunch and their mis-information targeted at mis-informed people. One must remember that without &#8220;Guns and Men who knew how to use them&#8211;we would be living under The Rising Sun, or saluting a swaztica&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z. Anconia</title>
		<link>http://freedomfactory.skyrocket.me/purpose-of-the-2nd-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-2222</link>
		<dc:creator>Z. Anconia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomfactory.skyrocket.me/?p=1630#comment-2222</guid>
		<description>Excellent video</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent video</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Viglione</title>
		<link>http://freedomfactory.skyrocket.me/purpose-of-the-2nd-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-2176</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Viglione</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomfactory.skyrocket.me/?p=1630#comment-2176</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&#039;#comment-2175&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Mike F.&lt;/a&gt; - We can glean intent from noting what happened-or did not happen-immediately following the passage of the Bill of Rights. The federal government did not immediately launch a gun confiscation program to prevent individuals, outside of a militia, from owning firearms. It was never an issue until late in the 20th century.

Moreover, the Bill of Rights is fundamentally, in every case, protection for the individual. Not a single one of the first ten Constitutional amendments (what we know as the Bill of Rights) pertains to groups, but rather, protects individuals from groups, including states. No state shall infringe upon individual rights guaranteed in the Constitution.

It would be odd for the framers to slip this one and only group right (pertaining to militias, not individuals) into the Constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='#comment-2175' rel="nofollow">@Mike F.</a> &#8211; We can glean intent from noting what happened-or did not happen-immediately following the passage of the Bill of Rights. The federal government did not immediately launch a gun confiscation program to prevent individuals, outside of a militia, from owning firearms. It was never an issue until late in the 20th century.</p>
<p>Moreover, the Bill of Rights is fundamentally, in every case, protection for the individual. Not a single one of the first ten Constitutional amendments (what we know as the Bill of Rights) pertains to groups, but rather, protects individuals from groups, including states. No state shall infringe upon individual rights guaranteed in the Constitution.</p>
<p>It would be odd for the framers to slip this one and only group right (pertaining to militias, not individuals) into the Constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike F.</title>
		<link>http://freedomfactory.skyrocket.me/purpose-of-the-2nd-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-2175</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomfactory.skyrocket.me/?p=1630#comment-2175</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Respectfully, your basic premise is wrong. The purpose of the law is to restrict the federal government from regulating weapons to people who are included in a “well regulated militia”.  </p>
<p>This so called controversy “over interpretation” has to do with people wanting to own a gun either for local protection, hunting or some other trivial reason. Organizations such as the NRA have twisted the meaning and original intent of the second amendment.</p>
<p>The founders knew that the security of a free state was paramount to the survival of this great nation. With foresight and clarity they crafted the Second Amendment. If the founders wanted any citizen to bear arms, for any particular reason and for any particular agenda, then it could have simply stated that. Notice that they didn’t do that.  Instead, the 2nd Amendment states (without any ambiguity)   “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State”. </p>
<p>To put it another way, an isolated individual has no realistic chance of providing a check on power to the federal government alone. A well regulated militia has a much more realistic chance of protecting our freedoms from a corrupt government, then an isolated individual with his Smith &amp; Wesson. </p>
<p>The interpretation is quite clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Viglione</title>
		<link>http://freedomfactory.skyrocket.me/purpose-of-the-2nd-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-2158</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Viglione</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomfactory.skyrocket.me/?p=1630#comment-2158</guid>
		<description>Lou Dobbs voices concern over Obama&#039;s desire to eradicate 2nd Amendment:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nv3p2lLmjGk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lou Dobbs voices concern over Obama&#8217;s desire to eradicate 2nd Amendment:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nv3p2lLmjGk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nv3p2lLmjGk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Thorson</title>
		<link>http://freedomfactory.skyrocket.me/purpose-of-the-2nd-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-2157</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Thorson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freedomfactory.skyrocket.me/?p=1630#comment-2157</guid>
		<description>Rob -

Excellent post.  Once again, it is to the U.S.Constitution that we must appeal, to combat the usurpation, by the federal government, of the rights that the Founders intended for a free people.  &quot;Moral&quot; arguments can be made from all sides of the argument regarding gun laws, but it is, ultimately, the moral argument, ingrained in the spirit of the Constitution, to protect its citizens for the tyranny of governments, to which we must appeal.  

Our government derives its authority to govern by the consent of the people, not the other way around.  Its limitations, spelled out in the Constitution, must be obeyed, or they forfeit their moral authority and pervert the law.

It is sad that Dr. Gratia&#039;s parents (and others) were murdered by this man, it is even worst that our government has prohibited the citizens of the republic from legally defending themselves from violent acts such as these.

Thanks for highlighting.  And thanks to Dr. Gratia for her courage to speak out on behalf of the Constitutionally protected rights (such as the 2nd Amendment) of this great republic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob -</p>
<p>Excellent post.  Once again, it is to the U.S.Constitution that we must appeal, to combat the usurpation, by the federal government, of the rights that the Founders intended for a free people.  &#8220;Moral&#8221; arguments can be made from all sides of the argument regarding gun laws, but it is, ultimately, the moral argument, ingrained in the spirit of the Constitution, to protect its citizens for the tyranny of governments, to which we must appeal.  </p>
<p>Our government derives its authority to govern by the consent of the people, not the other way around.  Its limitations, spelled out in the Constitution, must be obeyed, or they forfeit their moral authority and pervert the law.</p>
<p>It is sad that Dr. Gratia&#8217;s parents (and others) were murdered by this man, it is even worst that our government has prohibited the citizens of the republic from legally defending themselves from violent acts such as these.</p>
<p>Thanks for highlighting.  And thanks to Dr. Gratia for her courage to speak out on behalf of the Constitutionally protected rights (such as the 2nd Amendment) of this great republic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

