Categorized | Economics, Politics

Decomposing Obama’s State of the Union Address

Decomposing Obama’s State of the Union Address

President Obama is an incredible speaker. When on stage he resembles a preacher in a pulpit, often to similar affect. His speech before a joint session of the houses of Congress tonight is the perfect example of rubbish couched in eloquence. There were myriad pleas to humanity, citing one example after another of suffering to elicit emotion, but not much of what he proposed offers substantive solutions; rather, his Socialistic decrees will surely lead this country in the opposite direction. Here’s what I mean:

A big issue on everyone’s’ mind is the economy. We are bombarded with bad news daily, mainly from our public leaders. They tell us that unemployment is on the rise and will likely skyrocket. They tell us that we are facing severe and prolonged Depression unless we fork over trillions for them to play with. They tell us all sorts of things, like bailing out this bank will prevent systemic collapse, or forcing us to lend money to automakers that have not seen profit in decades is patriotic, etc. Our public leaders are not short of calls to patriotism and collective sacrifice these days.

Banking.

President Obama’s proposals begin with forcing banks to lend, adding more regulations to their activities, and cutting back on executive compensation. “I intend to hold these banks fully accountable for the assistance they receive, and this time, they will have to clearly demonstrate how taxpayer dollars result in more lending for the American taxpayer. This time, CEOs won’t be able to use taxpayer money to pad their paychecks or buy fancy drapes or disappear on a private jet. Those days are over.”

Clearly, Obama holds a good deal of disdain for Wall Street and banking executives. Why this group so heavily subsidized his presidential campaign is a mystery! Unfortunately, more regulation and involving government in management compensation issues will not bring the financial sector out of the doldrums. Nor will forcing banks to lend based on political considerations. Banks lend for a reason-not for fun, compassion, or spite, but to earn a profit. Healthy banking requires judicious decision-making with regards to the use of capital. With the federal government overseeing banks and mandating they increase lending, we will undoubtedly experience waste, capital misallocation, and inflation as the money supply is forced to grow.

Energy, Health Care, and Education.

Obama calls for $15 billion per year on alternative energy investment, saying that the nation must focus on wind, solar, biofuels, clean coal, and vehicle efficiency standards. He then calls for a sweeping carbon cap-and-trade program, which he terms “market oriented.” The likely result from this grandiose central planning: more fraud, waste, and abuse of the system, limited technological or economic success, growth of oversight bureaucracies, and higher energy costs for Americans. Electricity will become appreciably more expensive as power plants must pay for carbon offsets. The only way any of this will help the economy is if some government bureaucrat stumbles upon research success, but this eventuality decreases in likelihood the more we politicize research.

“We can no longer afford to put health care reform on hold,” Obama begins and then launches into a series of measures that lead to Socialized health care: Centralization of health records (which he oddly describes as “protecting privacy”!), a federal crusade to fight cancer, and whatever he means by saying “we must have quality, affordable health care for every American.” Ironically, quality and system affordability are inversely related to access!

Finally, to add to the perversion and double-speak Obama cites the move to Socialized health care as one that will “bring down the deficit in years to come.” Costs are never reduced by moving anything to government to manage. When did Americans start believing that government runs things efficiently?

With regards to education, Obama begins by saying: “It is our responsibility as lawmakers and educators to make this system work. But it is the responsibility of every citizen to participate in it.” This is his call to arms for every U.S. citizen to go to at least one year of higher education. He further bans people from dropping out of high school:

“And dropping out of high school is no longer an option. It’s not just quitting on yourself, it’s quitting on your country — and this country needs and values the talents of every American.”

This kind of language can quickly morph into persecution, branding people unpatriotic and perhaps treasonous for not satisfying bureaucratic mandates. Such a thought is not too far from the realm of possibility. It is no business of any politician what any of us do with our lives. If the Constitution and Bill of Rights still mean anything, we can confidently refute this notion by saying that “yes we still do have options, Mr. President, whether you like them or not!

Obama wraps up the speech with a promise: “I pledged to cut the deficit in half by the end of my first term in office. We have already identified two trillion dollars in savings over the next decade.”

Given that the federal government is committed to spending between $2 trillion to $3 trillion in deficit this year, alone, it is not clear what Obama means by saying he has uncovered $2 trillion in savings. Although, we do know how he intends to make up for some of the deficit: “We will restore a sense of fairness and balance to our tax code by finally ending the tax breaks for corporations that ship our jobs overseas.” Oh, and then there’s the massive tax increases to the top 5% of the population, in terms of income. How does discriminatory taxation equate to “fair and balance[d]“?

Protectionism and punative taxation are not ingredients in the recipe of economic success. This country is becoming increasingly hostile to work, savings, innovation, and wealth-pretty much all of the requirements for prosperity!

—–SPECIAL OFFERS—–

The Federal Reserve is creating tens of trillions of new dollars, debasing our currency, and silently taxing us all through inflation. With tens of trillions in federal budget deficits on the horizon there is nowhere for the US dollar to go, but down.
Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices

Refuse to be a victim of this flawed financial system, buy gold and silver NOW!

With hyperinflation and risk of economic disaster increasing with each dollar Congress recklessly spends, it pays to be prepared: Consider stocking up on Emergency Supplies:

Ultimate Year Supply

Bookmark and Share

No related posts.

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

This post was written by:

Rob Viglione - who has written 224 posts on The Freedom Factory.

Rob Viglione is a Realtor, economic consultant, and manager of a derivatives trading partnership. Rob has written extensively for Seeking Alpha and The Freedom Factory.

Contact the author

2 Responses to “Decomposing Obama’s State of the Union Address”

  1. Justin says:

    I was under the assumption these state of the union addresses were designed to convey substance, not emotionally rallying masses like a pep rally. I find it strange that standing ovations were led by Mr. Biden every 10 seconds, preceded by a powerful crescendo in Obama’s voice to the likes of the captain of the HS football team. I personally was hoping for an objective plan rather than emotional calamity. The goal of these things should be to get people thinking, not to establish a blackshirt movement to the likes of benito mussolini.

    We’ve seen this trend in every one of obama’s speeches. The goal is not to convey information or to weigh options, but rather to sell a product that’s already been purchased.

  2. Rob Viglione says:

    Justin, you nailed the point right on by noting that everything said was merely meant to “sell a product that’s already been purchased.”

    Obama is not trying to spark debate or analyze varying viewpoints to determine a best solution for anything; rather, he has his agenda and uses words like “bipartisan” and “open debate” as a form of subterfuge to make it appear as though he cares what others have to say.

    In his mind, Obama knows what’s best for all of us.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

Advert

Top 10 Freedom Fighters

Sponsors

Freedom Factory Stats